Mexico has banned the cultivation of GMO corn. The ban came after a court ruled that the government broke the law by not conducting a proper environmental impact study before authorizing GMO corn crops. Opponents of GMO corn believe it might be harmful to humans, and/or detrimental to Mexico's biodiversity. Supporters say GMO corn provides a solution to hunger and improves yields. Proponents also say that it provides a way to grow crops on difficult terrain. Comeback for first argument about environmental harm: They cite the monarch butterfly population as being impacted by herbicides used on GMO corn fields
Mexico has banned the cultivation of GMO corn.
In late 2017, Mexico’s Supreme Court ruled that the government broke the law when it authorized GMO corn cultivation without conducting an environmental impact study. The court ordered the government to suspend all GMO corn cultivation in Mexico until they conducted such a study and received approval from the public.
The ban was supported by a coalition of civil society organizations that argued that allowing GMO crops would have devastating effects on human health and the environment, including water contamination and increased pesticide use.
The ban came after a court ruled that the government broke the law by not conducting a proper environmental impact study before authorizing GMO corn crops.
The ban came after a court ruled that the government broke the law by not conducting a proper environmental impact study before authorizing GMO corn crops.
The decision was made following a lawsuit by Greenpeace Mexico, which argued that the government did not follow its own rules when it approved the planting of genetically modified corn in 2009.
Opponents of GMO corn believe it might be harmful to humans, and/or detrimental to Mexico's biodiversity.
Opponents of GMO corn believe it might be harmful to humans, and/or detrimental to Mexico's biodiversity.
GMO corn is one of the most widely-produced crops in the world. However, its risks have been called into question by critics who say that genetic modifications may reduce biodiversity and harm ecosystems, as well as threaten human health.
In Mexico—where researchers are still studying how genetically modified organisms (GMOs) affect human health—the ban on GMO corn came into effect in 2014. According to a study conducted by Greenpeace International, an environmental organization based in Amsterdam, "no country has ever approved so many GMO products at once."
Supporters say GMO corn provides a solution to hunger and improves yields.
Supporters of GMO corn say it provides a solution to hunger and improves yields.
They claim that GMO crops can help feed the world, which is why many countries have started using them in their agricultural sectors.
It's also believed that GMO corn can be beneficial for farmers because it grows on difficult terrain and can increase yields by up to 20%.
Proponents also say that it provides a way to grow crops on difficult terrain.
Proponents also say that it provides a way to grow crops on difficult terrain. In Mexico, for example, where GMO corn has been widely adopted, the plant can grow in areas of drought or extreme heat. In other words, it can thrive where other crops would not be able to grow.
Proponents also argue that GMO corn increases yields and is more nutritious than traditional varieties. This has led to criticism from some farmers who claim that genetic engineering is being rushed into markets without proper testing or regulation. Proponents counter by arguing that GMOs have been used safely for decades in many countries around the globe without causing any harm to humans or animals who consume them (another source of controversy).
Comeback for first argument about environmental harm: They cite the monarch butterfly population as being impacted by herbicides used on GMO corn fields.
The monarch butterfly population has been in decline for about 20 years, and it's not hard to see why. Monarch butterflies are migratory insects that travel from the United States to Mexico each year, where they lay their eggs on milkweed plants in the mountain region of central Mexico. When the monarchs return north in springtime, they lay new eggs on milkweed flowers near where they were born—and this cycle helps keep the population healthy. But with GMO corn fields covering much of their southern migration route and causing a decline in native milkweed plants (which provide an important food source), it's getting harder for them to survive.
Monsanto argues that its products have not been shown to be harmful to monarchs; however, when you consider how many GMO corn fields were planted before our understanding of how genetically modified organisms affect ecosystems was at all developed—and how much herbicide is used by those same fields—it's clear that we need more research into the potential problems caused by these crops before we can be sure what sort of impact they're having on our environment as a whole.
The decision could have major global implications, as many countries await the outcome of Mexico's case before making a decision about whether or not to allow GMO corn.
The decision could have major global implications, as many countries await the outcome of Mexico's case before making a decision about whether or not to allow GMO corn.
This is because several countries that currently allow GMO crops have banned them due to environmental and health concerns.
For example, France banned Monsanto's MON810 maize in 2008 following public outcry over possible risks associated with ingesting genetically modified food. The European Union followed suit in 2012 by implementing strict labeling requirements for foods containing GMOs and then went one step further by banning all MON810 cultivation across Europe in 2017.
In fact, more than 60 countries around the world have regulations against growing or importing GM crops—and several others have outright bans on their books.
Conclusion
The decision to ban GMO corn is a major one that could have ramifications across the world. It also has implications for the U.S., where GMO crops are grown on a large scale. This case could influence how countries make decisions about whether or not to allow genetically modified organisms in their food supply and agriculture practices
Comments